Quantitude

S1E17: Planned Missing Designs (or, How to Beat a Metaphor to Death)

Greg and Patrick start with what seems like a reasonable metaphor linking musical compositions to planned missing data designs, and then they proceed to beat it to death. Then, just when you think they’ve buried it, they dig it back up and beat the carcass some more before eventually just running out of time. In […]

S1E17: Planned Missing Designs (or, How to Beat a Metaphor to Death) Read More »

S1E16: Missing Data: (IF EPISODE=16 THEN EPISODE=-999)

In Episode 16 of Quantitude, Patrick and Greg have more fun than is probably socially acceptable when talking about missing data. In addition to embracing the Zen-like paradox of “the presence of missing data,” they also discuss West Point, “is” versus “are,” middle school English teachers, relentless tenacity, talking narwhals, being completely pregnant, taking in

S1E16: Missing Data: (IF EPISODE=16 THEN EPISODE=-999) Read More »

S1E15: Academia and the Chamber of Secrets

Greg and Patrick embark on a free-ranging discussion of many of the things no one bothers to tell you when entering academia, some that were particularly (and often pleasantly) surprising. They also talk about learning to fly, parenting, Richard Russo, Bayesian personality, Craisins, just noticeable differences, crayon giraffes, academic mulligans, final_final_final drafts, dead birds, Britney

S1E15: Academia and the Chamber of Secrets Read More »

S1E13: How Do I Get Scale Scores? Weight, Weight… Don’t Tell Me…

Greg and Patrick pursue several topics raised on prior episodes on scale reliability and measurement invariance to their logical conclusion. Namely, they ponder the multitude of persnickety issues associated with putting a set of items into the psychometric sausage maker to grind out scale scores for use in subsequent analysis. In addition to bickering with

S1E13: How Do I Get Scale Scores? Weight, Weight… Don’t Tell Me… Read More »

S1E12: Measurement (Non)Invariance — Can We Ever Fail to Not Incorrectly Reject It?

In this episode, Patrick and Greg respond to a call-in question that raises a host of issues revolving around measurement invariance testing. In addition to complaining about horrible terminology commonly used in quantitative methodology, they also address pirate mothers, irreverance, time machines, quadruple negatives, buying firewood, digging up bodies, the Schotz clock, and dumpster fires.

S1E12: Measurement (Non)Invariance — Can We Ever Fail to Not Incorrectly Reject It? Read More »

S1E11: Grants — Recommendations for Applicants (Disc 2)

In Part 2 of a two-part series, Greg and Patrick draw on their experiences with the National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Education Sciences (as grant PI/co-PI, reviewer, panelist, and panel chair) to offer recommendations for those planning to seek funding for their own research projects. They also talk about a thousand monkeys,

S1E11: Grants — Recommendations for Applicants (Disc 2) Read More »

S1E09: Grumpy Old Man & Village Idiot Argue About Reliability

In this first episode of 2020, Greg and Patrick welcome the new year by offering what listeners have come to expect: no apparent plan for the episode, followed by rambling, circular, and barely internally-consistent discussion. At least they are, well, reliable. In fact, their meanderings lead them to a discussion of just that topic —

S1E09: Grumpy Old Man & Village Idiot Argue About Reliability Read More »

15585

join our
email list

Scroll to Top